Cutting immigration has become a key election issue on both sides of the political spectrum.
Labour leader David Cunliffe has recently been reported on the NBR website indicating Labour would slash the net migration flow from 40,000 — which he claims is overheating the property market — to between 5000 and 15,000.
So what would this mean?
There are different measures of migration and Mr Cunliffe would be talking about Permanent and Long Term migration, or the New Zealand Residence Programme as both average just under 40,000. As we’re talking about the housing market it would make sense to look at how this would impact on residence visas issued.
On average just under 40,000 people come to live in New Zealand permanently every year. These are made up of four main streams – using 2012/13 figures roughly these are:
- 51% – skilled workers, entrepreneurs and investors
- 29% – the foreign-born children and partners of New Zealand citizens and residents
- 11% – the parents of migrants
- 8% – humanitarian and pacific quotas
So if immigration was cut, who would still get through? Are we just talking about foreign workers? The following is a view of the idea of these cuts using actual immigration figures from 2012/13:
I guess the individuals getting first option would be those NZ legally has to take under agreements and treaties – around 2,200 people.
Second option would presumably go to the children of NZ citizens and residents – around 1,200 places.
There would sadly only be just under 1,500 places for the foreign-born partners of kiwis with 85% (around 8,500) losing out.
This would leave no spaces for skilled workers or investors. I am guessing parents of migrants and other humanitarian cases we are not legally required to take would be at the back of the queue, no space for them either.
Expanding the number of places to 15,000 would enable all of the children and partners of NZ citizens and residents to get through – phew!
There would be space for around 883 skilled workers and their families (assuming the current rate of 1.65 people per application continues). Parents and other humanitarian cases would presumably lose out.
The effect of this change
I won’t go into how this policy might affect NZ, I’ll leave that to your discussion, but I’ll pose some questions:
- Will it be an incentive for kiwis to return to NZ if their families are not allowed to come too?
- Will reducing skilled migration by 92% affect skill shortages and NZ business?
- Will this affect the ability of NZ to support an ageing population?
Certainly food for thought. The migrant quota has been in place for many years (i.e. under Labour and National governments) providing benefit to NZ quietly year by year with balanced and controlled migration.
Migrant advocate, Licensed Immigration Adviser